There are limitations being revealed regarding your comments abour basic assumptions one of which the assumption of immense ages has actually not been vaguely close to being convincing, sorta proven let alone observed. Don't forget the basic fundamental rule to this whole scientific method requrired to be valid in the first place is that whatever your testing has to be OBSERVED and repeatedly at that now today. An alternative argument is not necessary considering your limiting starting assumptions. A few credible starting assumptions to prevent questionable dating should include: 1 a closed system uranium dating answers in genesis chance of interference is unrealistic. Science does not require direct observation. An individual cannot precisely measure a temperature, we rely on an instrument to do that. And in order to make sure that the instrument is accurate, we check it against other different types of instruments, and against known points freezing and melting of distilled water, for instance. When measuring ages of things very long ago, we rely on other tools.
Scientists use certain elements present in a certain abundance to calculate an approximate age for rocks. One of the decay ratios used is Uranium decaying through a series of alpha and beta decays to Lead. The number in superscript preceding the element name indicates the atomic mass, the sum of uranium dating answers in genesis protons and neutrons. Alpha decay releases a Helium nucleus two protons and two neutrons from the parent atom to create two atoms: the released Helium and a daughter product that has an atomic number two less than the original and an atomic mass four less than the original.
Of all the isotopic dating methods in use today, the uranium-lead method is the oldest and, when done carefully, the most reliable. Unlike any other method, uranium-lead has a natural cross-check built into it that shows when nature has tampered with the evidence. Uranium comes in two common isotopes with atomic weights of and we'll call them U and U.
More about uranium dating answers in genesis:
Uranium—lead datingabbreviated U—Pb datingis one of the oldest  and most refined of the radiometric dating schemes. It can be used to date rocks that formed and crystallised from about 1 million years to over 4. The method is usually uranium dating answers in genesis to zircon. This mineral incorporates uranium and thorium atoms into its crystal structurebut strongly rejects lead when forming. As a result, newly-formed zircon deposits will contain no lead, meaning that any lead found in the mineral is radiogenic. Since the exact rate at which uranium decays into lead is known, the current ratio of lead to uranium in a sample of the mineral can be used to reliably determine its age. The method relies on two separate decay chainsthe uranium series from U to Pb, with a half-life of 4. Uranium decays to lead via a series of alpha and beta decays, in which U with daughter nuclides undergo total eight alpha and six beta decays whereas U with daughters only experience seven alpha and four beta decays.
For the most part, dating sites aren't doing anything particularly mysterious. Sites mostly create taxonomies and match users based on their answers. In some cases, sites look at the gap between users' answers and their behaviours. For example, you might say that you prefer a very tall man with dark hair who is religious, but mainly click on profiles for shorter atheists.
The algorithm in that case would try to match you according to your behaviour. But maybe you're clicking on all of the profiles, even those that don't match your preferences, or sitting next to your sister, and she's also looking uranium dating answers in genesis a boyfriend в one who's short and blond.
In that case, the algorithm won't work either. It's best to treat dating sites as giant databases for you to explore.
But in reality, only 1, as the second one never actually put out for our brief dates. In fact the first one I dated, was the complete opposite. Was Software QA analyst. She would talk but was quite shy. She paid her half every time on dates.